The answer is inductive reasoning.
Using specific observations to make generalizations means inductive reasoning.
Inductive reasoning is opposite to deductive reasoning, it makes generalization from specific observations. Generalization is done from specific set of observations. After generalization, conclusions are drawn from the data. Inductive reasoning has its place in scientific method.
Inductive reasoning uses specific observation to make generalization.
Inductive reasoning is basically an approach to logical thinking. It entails making generalization based on specific details.
It is major critical thinking skills that many people, particularly employers sough after in their employees.
In inductive inferences, individual goes from specific observation to general. Scientists also use inductive reasoning to form theories and hypotheses.
There are different types of inductive reasoning and these include:
However, there are advantages of inductive reasoning
It gives individual the opportunity to work with ranges of probabilities and the assumptions that individual makes from a specific set of data are unlimited. However, inductive reasoning presents individual with a starting points and then drawn an informed conclusion.
Inductive reasoning can also help individual to come up with multiple solutions and use research to measure or evaluate other hypotheses. It provides individual the opportunity to use knowledge acquired from past experiences to form judgment and make new informed decisions in new situation.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
