WHAT IF THE FACTS WERE DIFFERENT? Assume that Goldsmith was hired as a computer technician solely to set up the servers. The people who hired him did not explain what they were going to do with the computers and servers. Would the result be different? 1. In this scenario, Goldsmith’s act was to . 2. Goldsmith to facilitate copyright infringement. 3. The act, alone, a wrongful act. 4. However, Goldsmith had of the plan to allow and facilitate copyright infringement. 5. Under these facts, Goldsmith a wrongful mental state. 6. Given Goldsmith’s act and mental state, Goldsmith likely commit criminal copyright infringement.

Question

contestada

Respuesta :

Аноним Аноним · Answer 1 · 2019-03-25T23:36:45+01:00

The correct answer is 6. Given Goldsmith's act and mental state, Goldsmith likely commit criminal copyright infringement.

Answer Link

mbm1000 mbm1000 · Answer 2 · 2019-03-31T23:55:51+02:00

1. In this scenario, Goldsmith's act was to set up servers that allowed copyright infringement.

2. Goldsmith did not intend to facilitate copyright infringement

3. The act, alone, was a wrongful act.

4. However, Goldsmith had no knowledge of the plan to allow and facilitate copyright infringement.

5. Under these facts, Goldsmith did not have a wrongful mental state.

6. Given Goldsmith’s act and mental state, Goldsmith likely did not commit criminal copyright infringement.