Read this passage:

LADY MACBETH. Glamis thou art, and Cawdor; and shalt be
What thou art promised. Yet do I fear thy nature;
It is too full o' th' milk of human kindness
To catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great,
Art not without ambition, but without
The illness should attend it. What thou wouldst highly,
That wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false,
And yet wouldst wrongly win. Thou'ld'st have, great Glamis,
That which cries, "Thus thou must do," if thou have it,
And that which rather thou dost fear to do,
Than wishest should be undone. Hie thee hither,
That I may pour my spirits in thine ear
And chastise with the valor of my tongue
All that impedes thee from the golden round,
Which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem
To have thee crowned withal.

William Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act I, scene v
What evidence from the text supports the idea that Lady Macbeth questions her husband's ability to kill the king?

A.
Glamis thou art, and Cawdor; and shalt be / What thou art promised.

B.
Hie thee hither, / That I may pour my spirits in thine ear

C.
Art not without ambition, but without / The illness should attend it.

D.
Which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem / To have thee crowned withal.

Respuesta :

The evidence of the idea that Lady Macbeth questions her husband's ability to kill is "Art not without ambition, but without / The illness should attend it."

What is evidence?

We call evidence any type of information that can help us reach a conclusion or support an idea. Here, we are looking for the evidence to support the idea that Lady Macbeth questions her husband's ability to kill the king.

The best option is letter C, where Lady Macbeth talks about ambition and evil. In her opinion, her husband is ambitious, but that alone is not enough. He must also be evil, that is, capable of doing anything it takes to get what he wants.

With the information above in mind, we can select option C as the correct answer.

Learn more about evidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/1455721

#SPJ1